A Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Administration of the Health Improvement Card as a Health Promotion Tool: A Physiotherapist-Led Community-Based Initiative.

A randomised controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the administration of the Health Improvement Card (HIC) on lifestyle practices and biometric variables in community-dwelling Chinese participants. Adults living in Shanghai were randomly assigned to either the HIC-intervention or control group. Measurements/assessments were conducted at baseline and three-month follow-up. Supervised physiotherapy students administered the HIC and four standardised questionnaires related to health and wellbeing. Both groups received a health promotion education pamphlet. Based on participants' HIC biometric and lifestyle scores, students prescribed lifestyle, and exercise advice to the HIC-intervention group. 171 individuals (39 men, 132 women) (mean age 68.4 ± 9.7 y) participated. At follow-up, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference decreased significantly in the HIC-intervention group. Furthermore, the number of participants in the HIC-intervention group categorised as low risk regarding their physical activity and dietary practices, increased by 32.2% and 20%, respectively. Changes in standardised questionnaire scores did not meet minimum clinically importance differences in either group. This is the first study to demonstrate that HIC-informed health promotion education can improve people's lifestyle practices, thereby, objective biometric variables. Evaluation of the effect of HIC-informed lifestyle education on some biometric parameters (blood pressure and BMI) may warrant a longer timeframe.

Relationship of Barthel Index and its Short Form with the Modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke patients.

BACKGROUND: Modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index are the most common scales for assessing stroke outcomes in clinical practice and trials. Concordance between the Barthel Index scores and the modified Rankin Scale grades is important to define favorable outcome in clinical practice and stroke trials consistently. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the scores of Barthel Index and 3-item Barthel Index Short Form with the modified Rankin Scale grades of acute stroke patients. METHODS: Barthel Index, Barthel Index Short Form scores and modified Rankin Scale grades of 516 stroke patients were obtained from a follow-up study of the Longshi Scale in China. A study showed that the assignment of modified Rankin Scale grades to stroke patients was prone to misclassification. Therefore, the recorded modified Rankin Scale grades were compared with the Barthel Index scores of each patient to produce the adjusted modified Rankin Scale grades. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses were performed to determine the optimal cutoff scores, respective sensitivities and specificities of Barthel Index and Barthel Index Short Form with the corresponding adjusted modified Rankin Scale grades ≤1, ≤2 and ≤3. FINDINGS: About 44% of the recorded modified Rankin Scale grades of patients required adjustment. The optimal cutoff scores were ≥100 (sensitivity 100%; specificity 95.3%), ≥100 (sensitivity 98.1%; specificity 100%) and ≥75 (sensitivity 93.8%; specificity, 91.9%) for the Barthel Index and ≥40 (sensitivity 100%; specificity 78.9%), ≥40 (sensitivity 98.1%; specificity 82.8%), and ≥35 (sensitivity 99.3%; specificity, 91.6%) for the Barthel Index Short Form corresponding to the adjusted modified Rankin Scale grade ≤1, ≤2, and ≤3 respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were nearly all above 0.9. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal cutoff scores of Barthel Index and Barthel Index Short Form corresponding to the modified Rankin Scale grades ≤1, ≤2 and ≤3 were recommended to be ≥100 and ≥40, ≥100 and ≥40, and ≥75 and ≥35 respectively for determining the favorable and unfavorable outcome of stroke patients within three months of onset in clinical practice and trials.